top of page

Santa Clara Law Review


CONSERVATIVE FAMILY VALUES AS CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: PRIVATE REGULATION AND THE EROSION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS
Abstract: This Article examines a paradox in contemporary constitutional law: While constitutional rights traditionally protect minorities against majority preferences, the Supreme Court has increasingly enabled certain private actors to override others’ constitutionally protected family formation choices through what this Article calls “private regulation.” The Court’s decisions allow individual private actors to impose traditional religious and moral views on others who do
Clara Spera; Katherine Fleming


MEDICAL DEVICE STERILIZATION AS A PUBLIC HEALTH PARADOX
Abstract: Medical device sterilization processes are a public health paradox. Sterility is necessary to assure product safety, yet emissions from the most common form of industrial sterilization, ethylene oxide (EtO), cause cancer. The connection between ethylene oxide and health risks has existed for decades, though recent litigation, state legislation, and advocacy efforts have illuminated the risks. This Article explores the large-scale EtO emissions in Willowbrook, Illino
Jordan Paradise


MODELING MEANING: CAUSAL INFERENCE UNDER THE CALIFORNIA RACIAL JUSTICE ACT
Abstract: In order to evaluate claims arising under the California Racial Justice Act (RJA), judges and attorneys need to learn how to draw inferences about racial disparity from data—and, equally importantly, to learn how to avoid drawing inaccurate inferences from data. The key questions in many RJA claims are, first, how to determine what constitutes “defendant[s] who have engaged in similar conduct and are similarly situated” and, second, what might supply race-neutral re
W. David Ball
bottom of page